Interphase Circulation Analysis and Suppression in Modular Multilevel Battery Energy Storage Systems

This paper investigates the interphase circulation characteristics of modular multilevel converter-based battery energy storage systems (MMC-BESS). Through theoretical derivation and experimental verification, we establish the relationship between submodule voltage fluctuation and circulating current components while proposing effective suppression strategies.

System Topology and Operating Principles

The MMC-BESS architecture consists of three phase units with each phase containing upper/lower arms comprising N submodules. Each submodule integrates battery cells with power electronics, governed by:

$$P_{bat} = V_{bat}I_{sub}(t) = V_o(t)I_o(t)$$

Key parameters of the experimental platform are summarized in Table 1:

Parameter Value Parameter Value
AC phase voltage 28.9 V Arm inductance 0.1 mH
DC bus voltage 85.8 V Submodules per arm 8
Battery voltage 12 V Total submodules 48

Circulation Current Generation Mechanism

The energy storage system exhibits three distinct circulation current components:

1. Double-Frequency Circulation

Submodule current contains multiple frequency components:

$$I_{sub}(t) = \frac{1}{V_{bat}}\left[\frac{V_mI_m\cos\phi}{2} + \frac{V_{o-dc}I_{dc}}{3} + \frac{V_mI_m\cos(2\omega_0 t+\phi)}{2}\right]$$

Battery impedance causes voltage fluctuation:

$$\Delta U_{2\omega} = N\Delta u_{bat} = 16 \times 7.28\text{mV} = 0.116\text{V}$$

Inductance-limited circulation current magnitude:

$$\Delta i_{2\omega} = \frac{\Delta U_{2\omega} \Delta t}{4L_a} = \frac{0.116 \times 5\text{ms}}{4 \times 0.1\text{mH}} = 1.46\text{A}$$

2. Fundamental Frequency Circulation

Parameter asymmetry between upper/lower arms creates fundamental frequency component:

$$I_{cir1} = \frac{\Delta V_{arm}}{3Z_{loop}}$$

3. High-Frequency Circulation

Switching inconsistencies generate high-frequency components suppressed by arm inductance:

$$I_{hf} = \frac{\Delta V_{sw}}{N\sqrt{(\omega L_a)^2 + R_{arm}^2}}$$

Circulation Suppression Strategies

Effective control methods for energy storage systems include:

Component Suppression Method Effectiveness
2nd Harmonic Negative sequence dq control >85% reduction
Fundamental Battery SOC balancing 70-90% reduction
High Frequency Arm inductance design >95% suppression

The proposed 2nd harmonic suppression controller implements:

$$G_c(s) = K_p + \frac{K_i}{s} + \frac{2\omega_0 L_a}{V_{dc}}$$

Experimental Verification

Testing on a 48-submodule energy storage system demonstrates:

Condition Circulation Current THD
Balanced SOC 0.8A peak 8.2%
Unbalanced SOC 2.1A peak 15%

The results validate the theoretical analysis of interphase circulation characteristics in battery energy storage systems. The proposed suppression methods effectively maintain system stability while preserving energy storage efficiency.

Conclusion

This work establishes comprehensive circulation current models for modular multilevel battery energy storage systems, providing:

  1. Analytical expressions for multiple frequency components
  2. Quantitative relationships between battery parameters and circulation currents
  3. Hierarchical suppression strategies for different frequency bands

The methodology enhances the operational reliability and power quality of large-scale energy storage systems, particularly valuable for renewable energy integration applications requiring high-efficiency power conversion.

Scroll to Top