A Comprehensive Review of Cooling Technologies for Solar Panels

The finite nature of fossil fuel reserves and their associated environmental impacts from widespread use in power generation and transportation have driven a global shift towards renewable energy sources as long-term development goals. Among these, solar energy stands out as a clean, non-polluting resource. High-grade electrical energy is harnessed from sunlight via photovoltaic conversion within solar panels. A standard solar panel is typically a laminated structure consisting of a front glass cover, an encapsulant layer (often EVA – ethylene-vinyl acetate), the photovoltaic cells (typically silicon-based), and a rear backsheet. This multi-layer assembly is designed for durability and protection of the sensitive cells.

However, a critical challenge limits the efficiency of this technology. Research indicates that the photoelectric conversion efficiency of typical photovoltaic cells ranges from only 6% to 19%. A significant portion of the incident solar energy is not converted into electricity but is instead dissipated as heat within the cell. This heat accumulation has a profoundly negative effect: for every 1°C increase in the operating temperature of a silicon solar cell, its conversion efficiency decreases by approximately 0.4% to 0.5%. Furthermore, sustained high temperatures accelerate thermal degradation processes within the solar panel, leading to irreversible structural damage and a shortened operational lifespan. Consequently, implementing effective cooling measures is not merely an option but a necessity to enhance the energy output and economic viability of solar panel installations. Air and water, as readily available cooling media, offer effective means to lower cell temperature. Moreover, in a photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) system concept, the heated coolant can be utilized as a thermal energy source, thereby improving the overall energy utilization factor of the system. This article provides a comprehensive, first-person review of recent research progress on air-cooling and water-cooling techniques for solar panels. I will analyze the temperature reduction and efficiency gains achieved, discuss key findings, and incorporate insights from numerical studies, particularly on surface film cooling.

1. Air-Cooling Techniques for Solar Panels

Air-cooling, categorized into natural convection and forced ventilation based on the presence of a driving force, is prized for its structural simplicity, ease of maintenance, and technological maturity. The primary research focus lies in enhancing the convective heat transfer coefficient or increasing the effective heat exchange surface area of the solar panel assembly.

1.1 Natural Convection Cooling

Common natural convection configurations involve attaching fins or creating an air channel at the rear of the solar panel. The objective is to promote buoyancy-driven airflow, carrying heat away from the panel’s back surface.

From the perspective of increasing surface area, studies have numerically investigated solar panels with attached rear fins. Results suggest that such modifications can raise the average electrical efficiency of the panel by around 0.417% compared to a standard, un-finned module. Experimental validation confirms these findings, showing that finned solar panels can achieve an average electrical efficiency improvement between 0.3% and 1.8%. The geometry of the fins plays a crucial role; research into fin height and quantity indicates that increasing both parameters can lower the average temperature of a solar panel by approximately 4–5°C. Further optimization reveals that the installation angle of the fins relative to the solar panel backplane significantly impacts cooling performance. An optimal angle around 45° can reduce the panel temperature by at least 10°C, boosting maximum output power by up to 7.55%.

Alternatively, installing an open air channel behind a vertically or inclined-mounted solar panel leverages the chimney effect to enhance natural convection. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) studies of temperature and velocity distributions in such vertical channels show that solar panels with open channels can exhibit maximum temperatures up to 8°C lower than those with enclosed rear spaces. Similar models applied to building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) facades report maximum temperature reductions of 15–20°C. A critical insight from more comprehensive modeling is the significant role of thermal radiation. Earlier studies often neglected radiation heat transfer from the solar panel to the surroundings. When thermal radiation is incorporated into the energy balance for channel-cooled panels, the calculated average panel temperature can be about 26°C lower than in models that consider only conduction and convection. For a solar panel with a heat flux exceeding 200 W/m², roughly 30% of the heat loss can occur via radiation, making it a non-negligible factor in thermal modeling.

1.2 Forced Ventilation Cooling

Forced ventilation cooling employs fans or blowers to actively drive air through a channel behind the solar panel, thereby increasing the airflow velocity and the convective heat transfer coefficient for more aggressive cooling.

Experimental comparisons between natural and forced convection for the same solar panel geometry and irradiance level demonstrate the advantage of active cooling. Forced ventilation can reduce the panel temperature by about 15°C and simultaneously increase electrical output power by approximately 15%. Further studies correlate the performance gain with inlet air velocity, showing that at an air speed of 6 m/s, the electrical output power of the photovoltaic cells can be enhanced by up to 19%. Accurate prediction of the system’s thermal and fluid dynamics performance is crucial for design. CFD simulations have been extensively used, with studies indicating that the RNG k-ε turbulence model offers the best accuracy in predicting air temperature, velocity, and turbulent kinetic energy distributions within the channel, providing valuable guidance for numerical modeling of solar panel cooling. Validated thermal models for solar panels under forced convection show good agreement with experimental data, confirming electrical efficiency improvements of 4–5% for the cells.

Beyond airflow velocity, the geometry of the air channel itself is a major design parameter influencing cooling effectiveness. Research on BIPV systems suggests an optimal air gap of around 0.1 m between the solar panel and the building wall to ensure sufficient airflow for cooling. For roof-mounted panels, studies using CFD to evaluate the impact of roof tilt and channel size conclude that both the average and maximum temperature of the solar panel decrease with increasing tilt angle and air gap width. For single or multiple panel arrangements, the minimum recommended air gap is 0.14–0.16 m and 0.12–0.15 m, respectively. Dimensionless parameters have been proposed to generalize design rules. The channel aspect ratio (air gap width / channel length, b/L) and the dimensionless length (channel length / hydraulic diameter, L/D) are key. Findings indicate that optimal cooling is achieved when b/L is near 0.11 or when L/D is approximately 20, with the latter being largely independent of installation tilt angle.

1.3 Analysis of Air-Cooling Research

Both natural and forced convection play vital roles in cooling solar panels. Fin-based or channel-based designs offer simplicity and low initial investment, but their cooling capacity is inherently limited; further temperature reduction necessitates the introduction of fans, which consume parasitic energy. Research into optimal air channel dimensions is essential to minimize the overheating of the solar panel while reducing material costs and fan energy consumption. My own analysis, incorporating radiation models in thermal simulations, underscores its importance. The neglect of radiation can lead to an overestimation of the operating temperature by as much as 25°C. Under air-cooling conditions, the average temperature of a solar panel exhibits a linear relationship with solar irradiance (G) and ambient temperature (Tamb). A simplified correlation can be expressed as:

$$ T_{panel,avg} = \alpha \cdot G + \beta \cdot T_{amb} + C $$

Where analysis of compiled data suggests the coefficient for solar irradiance (\(\alpha\)) is relatively small (around 0.03 °C/(W/m²)), while the coefficient for ambient temperature (\(\beta\)) is much larger (around 0.92). This indicates that the ambient air temperature is a more dominant factor than irradiance in determining the operating temperature of an air-cooled solar panel.

Table 1: Summary of Research on Air-Cooling for Solar Panels

Cooling Method Key Design Variable Typical Temperature Reduction Typical Electrical Gain Notes
Fins (Natural Convection) Fin height, count, angle 4°C – 10°C+ 0.3% – 1.8% (Efficiency), up to 7.55% (Power) Passive, low maintenance. Optimal fin angle ~45°.
Air Channel (Natural) Channel openness, geometry 8°C – 20°C Up to 8.6% (Power) Relies on chimney effect. Radiation accounts for ~30% of heat loss.
Forced Ventilation Air velocity, channel dimensions ~15°C – 30°C 15% – 19% (Power), 4-5% (Efficiency) Requires fan power. Performance depends heavily on airflow rate.
Optimized Channel Aspect ratio (b/L ~0.11) or (L/D ~20) Minimized for given conditions Maximized net yield General design guideline to balance cooling and pressure drop/construction cost.

2. Water-Cooling Techniques for Solar Panels

Given its superior thermal properties (higher specific heat capacity and thermal conductivity), water is a more effective cooling medium than air, leading to more significant temperature reductions in solar panels, especially in high-temperature environments. Water-cooling methods are primarily classified based on the water’s flow path and contact location: channel-based cooling and surface film cooling.

2.1 Channel-Based Water Cooling

In this approach, a channel or pipe network carrying circulating water is attached to the rear (or, less commonly, the front) of the solar panel. Heat is transferred from the panel to the water, which is then transported away for use or dissipation.

Most studies position the water channel on the back of the solar panel. Experimental investigations report significant benefits: average front and back surface temperature reductions of 9.7°C and 14.5°C, respectively, and overall electrical output power increases of 15–20%. The advancement of computational tools has facilitated detailed analysis. Simulations using engineering equation solver (EES) software for hybrid PV/T systems show that water cooling can reduce the photovoltaic module temperature by about 20%, corresponding to a 9% improvement in electrical efficiency. Parametric studies via software like COMSOL Multiphysics reveal that increasing the water channel depth from 10 mm to 20 mm can lead to a maximum temperature drop of 10.2°C. Furthermore, increasing the inlet Reynolds number (Re) can enhance the heat transfer effectiveness of the solar panel by 25%. The performance gain also varies with solar cell material. Comparative experiments on crystalline silicon solar panels show that under similar cooling, monocrystalline silicon (c-Si) modules experience an average temperature drop of 13.6% and an average electrical efficiency gain of 13%, while polycrystalline silicon (p-Si) modules show a 7.2% temperature drop and a 6.2% efficiency gain.

Since the front glass of a solar panel is typically 1.5–2°C hotter than the backsheet, an alternative design places the water channel on the front (top) side to intercept heat earlier. Research on such systems for maximizing PV/T output indicates that an optimal balance exists; for instance, with a channel depth of 5 mm and a water flow rate of 0.003 kg/s, the system can achieve its peak overall energy utilization factor. A critical trade-off in any front-side cooling is the optical loss due to the glass and water layers, which attenuate the solar irradiance reaching the cell. Therefore, system design must carefully balance thermal extraction against optical transmission losses.

Table 2: Summary of Research on Channel-Based Water Cooling for Solar Panels

Configuration Key Findings Typical Temperature Reduction Typical Performance Gain
Rear Channel Effective back-surface cooling. Performance depends on flow rate, channel geometry, and cell material. 10°C – 20°C 8-20% (Power), 6-13% (Efficiency)
Front/Top Channel Intercepts heat at hotter surface. Requires optimization to manage optical losses from covering glass/water. ~16°C Significant thermal yield, electrical gain must be evaluated net of optical loss.
Parametric Influence Increased channel depth and flow rate (Re) improve heat extraction. Monocrystalline silicon benefits more than polycrystalline. Varies with parameters Heat transfer can be improved by 25% with higher Re.

2.2 Surface Water Film Cooling

This technique involves spraying or flowing a thin film of water directly over the front surface of the solar panel. Cooling is achieved primarily through convective heat transfer from the glass to the water film, with a secondary contribution from evaporative cooling.

Pioneering work in this area demonstrated that under a flowing water film, a solar panel’s maximum temperature could drop by up to 22°C, leading to a 10.3% increase in daily energy output. Subsequent in-depth studies have confirmed and quantified these benefits, reporting electrical efficiency improvements of 2.7% and 0.51%, and maximum power output increases of 30.7% and 4.84% in different experimental setups. The effect varies across photovoltaic technologies. A comparative study of five different module types under surface film cooling reported daily average electrical efficiency improvements as follows: 0.89% for monocrystalline silicon (m-Si), 0.68% for polycrystalline silicon (p-Si), 0.22% for amorphous silicon (a-Si), 0.34% for cadmium telluride (CdTe), and 0.72% for copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS).

The performance enhancement stems from two synergistic effects. Approximately half of the gain is attributed to the convective cooling and temperature reduction of the solar panel. The other half is due to an optical effect: the water film reduces the reflection loss at the air-glass interface. As light passes from air into the water layer (with a refractive index closer to that of glass), less light is reflected away, effectively increasing the transmittance and the irradiance on the solar cells beneath. This dual benefit makes surface cooling particularly attractive. The thickness of the water film is a critical parameter. If too thin, coverage and cooling are uneven; if too thick, it increases optical absorption and parasitic pumping power. Research indicates an optimal flow rate corresponding to a film thickness around 1.1 mm, which balances cooling performance and light transmission.

Table 3: Summary of Research on Surface Water Film Cooling for Solar Panels

Aspect Studied Key Findings Typical Temperature Reduction Typical Performance Gain
Overall System Gain Combines thermal cooling and optical (anti-reflection) benefits. 15°C – 22°C 4-10% (Power), ~0.5-3% (Efficiency)
Technology Comparison Efficiency gain varies by cell material. Crystalline silicon shows larger gains than thin-film under cooling. Varies m-Si: +0.89%, p-Si: +0.68%, a-Si: +0.22%, CdTe: +0.34%, CIGS: +0.72% (Avg. Efficiency)
Optimal Parameters Water film thickness is crucial. ~1.1 mm thickness often cited as optimal for cooling/transmission balance. Maximized at optimal flow Maximized at optimal flow
Additional Benefits Water film helps clean panel surface, reducing soiling losses. Reduces reflection loss optically. N/A Contributes to the total reported power gain.

2.3 Analysis of Water-Cooling Research

Water’s superior thermal properties make it a highly effective coolant for solar panels, especially in hot climates. However, compared to air-cooled systems, channel-based water cooling often involves more complex plumbing, higher installation costs, and greater maintenance demands, limiting its widespread application. Surface film cooling offers the distinct advantages of also cleaning the panel and reducing optical reflection losses. Nevertheless, its practical implementation is constrained by water availability and consumption. The daily evaporation and runoff requirement can be substantial, making it less viable in arid or water-scarce regions unless water recycling is implemented.

Numerical modeling has become an indispensable tool for understanding the complex, multi-factor interactions in solar panel film cooling (solar irradiance, ambient temperature, wind speed, water flow rate, film distribution). My analysis of such models highlights that, similar to air-cooling, ambient temperature is a dominant factor governing the baseline temperature of the solar panel. Under surface film cooling, once a sufficient water flow is established, variations in solar irradiance have a diminished direct impact on the cell’s operating temperature because the cooling effect scales with the thermal load. A more critical issue revealed by simulation is flow distribution. Non-uniform water film distribution leads to significant temperature gradients across the solar panel. Such localized hot spots not only reduce the total power output (as power drops non-linearly with temperature) but also induce thermal-mechanical stresses that can accelerate the degradation of the solar panel, indirectly affecting its service life. The uniformity of the water film is therefore a key design and performance metric.

3. Summary and Future Perspectives

This review has synthesized recent progress on air and water-cooling techniques for solar panels. Key conclusions can be drawn:

  1. Air-Cooling: This remains a practical and low-maintenance solution. Research focusing on optimal air channel dimensions (using parameters like b/L or L/D) is vital to minimize the overheating of the solar panel while reducing material costs and fan energy consumption. Accurate thermal modeling must account for radiation heat transfer, as its omission can lead to significant errors (~25°C). The operating temperature of an air-cooled solar panel is strongly linearly correlated with ambient temperature (coefficient ~0.92), more so than with solar irradiance (coefficient ~0.03).
  2. Channel-Based Water Cooling: While offering superior cooling performance and enabling PV/T synergy, these systems are often more complex and costly. Their application is most justified in scenarios where the thermal energy can be utilized, improving the overall system economics.
  3. Surface Water Film Cooling: This method provides a dual benefit: active cooling of the solar panel and an optical boost from reduced reflection. However, its viability is geographically limited by water availability. Research must consider film distribution uniformity to prevent damaging temperature gradients across the solar panel.
  4. General Insights: For all cooling methods, the thermal and electrical performance of the solar panel is a coupled phenomenon. The efficiency gain \(\Delta \eta\) from a temperature drop \(\Delta T\) can be approximated as:
    $$ \Delta \eta \approx \gamma \cdot \Delta T $$
    where \(\gamma\) is the temperature coefficient (typically -0.004 to -0.005 °C-1 for silicon solar panels). The net benefit of any active cooling system must always be evaluated against the parasitic energy consumption of pumps or fans.

Future Outlook: As global energy demand rises and the deployment of solar panels expands, effective cooling will become increasingly important to maximize energy yield and return on investment. Surface film cooling, with its combined optical and thermal benefits, presents a compelling research frontier. Future work should focus on:

  • Developing low-cost, highly uniform water distribution systems to eliminate hot spots on the solar panel.
  • Optimizing control strategies that dynamically adjust water flow based on irradiance and ambient conditions to balance the electrical gain of the solar panel against pumping energy consumption.
  • Exploring hybrid cooling systems (e.g., combined rear air channel and intermittent front spray) for extreme climates.
  • Investigating advanced coolants or phase-change materials for passive, high-capacity thermal management of solar panels.

With continued innovation, advanced cooling strategies will undoubtedly enhance the performance, reliability, and economic attractiveness of solar panel installations, contributing significantly to a sustainable energy future.

Scroll to Top