Integration of Quasi-PR and Improved Repetitive Control in Solar Inverters with Active Filtering Capability

The growing adoption of solar energy systems demands enhanced grid-interaction capabilities for photovoltaic (PV) inverters. This paper presents a novel composite control strategy combining quasi-proportional resonant (PR) control and enhanced repetitive control, enabling solar inverters to simultaneously perform grid-tie functions and active harmonic compensation. The proposed approach addresses the limitations of conventional control methods while leveraging the structural similarities between PV inverters and active power filters.

1. System Architecture and Harmonic Detection

The solar inverter system integrates three critical functional blocks:

$$ \begin{cases}
P_{PV} = I_{PV} \times V_{PV} \\
Q_{comp} = \sum_{h=2}^{50} I_h^2 \times X_h
\end{cases} $$

Where \( P_{PV} \) represents photovoltaic output power and \( Q_{comp} \) denotes harmonic compensation capacity. The harmonic detection employs an enhanced ip-iq method based on instantaneous power theory:

Component Transformation Matrix
αβ Conversion $$ C_{32} = \frac{2}{3}\begin{bmatrix} 1 & -\frac{1}{2} & -\frac{1}{2} \\ 0 & \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} & -\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} \end{bmatrix} $$
dq Conversion $$ C = \begin{bmatrix} \sin\omega t & -\cos\omega t \\ -\cos\omega t & -\sin\omega t \end{bmatrix} $$

2. Composite Control Strategy

The proposed quasi-PR + repetitive control architecture overcomes individual limitations through synergistic cooperation:

$$ G_{PR}(s) = K_p + \frac{2K_r\omega_c s}{s^2 + 2\omega_c s + \omega_0^2} $$
$$ G_{RC}(z) = \frac{z^{-N}K_R S(z)}{1 – Q(z)z^{-N}} $$

Control Parameter Optimization
Parameter Quasi-PR Repetitive
Bandwidth 5 Hz 25th harmonic
Gain (K) K_p=10, K_r=100 K_R=1
Phase Margin 45° 60°

3. Harmonic Compensation Performance

The solar inverter demonstrates superior harmonic suppression capabilities:

$$ THD = \sqrt{\sum_{h=2}^{50}\left(\frac{I_h}{I_1}\right)^2} \times 100\% $$

THD Comparison of Control Strategies
Control Method Steady-State THD Response Time
Pure PR 4.65% 2.5 ms
Pure Repetitive 2.32% 20 ms
Composite Control 1.92% 5 ms

4. Dynamic Response Enhancement

The hybrid control strategy achieves rapid compensation during irradiance transients:

$$ \tau_{comp} = \frac{1}{2\pi f_c} \ln\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}}\right) $$

Where \( f_c \) represents crossover frequency (2 kHz) and \( \zeta \) denotes damping ratio (0.707). The solar inverter maintains grid synchronization within 10 ms under 30% step load changes.

5. Implementation Considerations

Critical design factors for practical solar inverter applications:

$$ L_{filter} = \frac{V_{dc}}{6f_{sw}\Delta I_{pp}} $$

  • Switching frequency (\( f_{sw} \)): 10 kHz
  • DC link voltage (\( V_{dc} \)): 600 V
  • Current ripple (\( \Delta I_{pp} \)): <20% rated

This integrated control approach enables solar inverters to deliver 97.8% conversion efficiency while maintaining grid current THD below 2% across varying operating conditions. The strategy demonstrates particular effectiveness in weak grid scenarios with multiple harmonic sources, making it suitable for large-scale PV plant applications.

Scroll to Top