Introduction
The rapid integration of renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar, into power grids has heightened the demand for energy storage systems (ESS). These systems play a critical role in stabilizing grid operations by balancing supply and demand through peak shaving and valley filling. Central to ESS functionality is the energy storage inverter, which serves as the bidirectional interface between energy storage devices (e.g., batteries) and the grid. This paper presents the development of a Rapid Control Prototyping (RCP) platform for energy storage inverters using RT-LAB, a real-time simulation system. The platform enables rapid validation of control algorithms, enhancing the reliability and efficiency of inverter design.
Topology and Control Strategy of Energy Storage Inverters
The energy storage inverter employs a two-level voltage-source converter (VSC) topology, as depicted below:

The mathematical model of the energy storage inverter in the synchronous rotating ( dq )-frame is expressed as: [ L \frac{d}{dt} \begin{bmatrix} i_d \ i_q \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} u{sd} \ u{sq} \end{bmatrix} – R \begin{bmatrix} i_d \ i_q \end{bmatrix} + \omega L \begin{bmatrix} -i_q \ i_d \end{bmatrix} – \begin{bmatrix} u{cd} \ u{cq} \end{bmatrix} ] where ( L ) and ( R ) represent the filter inductance and resistance, ( u{sd} ) and ( u{sq} ) are grid voltages, ( u{cd} ) and ( u{cq} ) are inverter output voltages, and ( i_d ), ( i_q ) are grid currents.
The control strategy utilizes a dual-loop vector control framework:
- Outer Loop: Regulates active power ( P ) and reactive power ( Q ).
- Inner Loop: Implements ( dq )-axis current decoupling for dynamic tracking.
The active and reactive power equations are: [ P = 1.5 u{sd} i_d, \quad Q = -1.5 u{sd} i_q ] A PI-based control structure ensures precise tracking of reference values ( P{\text{ref}} ) and ( Q{\text{ref}} ).
RT-LAB-Based RCP Platform Design
Hardware Architecture
The RCP platform integrates three components:
- RT-LAB Real-Time Simulator: Executes control algorithms developed in MATLAB/Simulink.
- Energy Storage Inverter: Converts DC power from a battery emulator to AC for grid integration.
- Battery Emulator: A programmable DC source mimicking battery charge/discharge characteristics.
Key parameters of the experimental setup are summarized in Table 1.
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| DC Link Voltage | 200 V |
| Grid Voltage (AC) | 380 V |
| Filter Inductance (( L )) | 1.2 mH |
| Switching Frequency | 5 kHz |
| Simulation Step Size | 100 μs |
High-Precision PWM Generation
Traditional PWM methods suffer from timing inaccuracies due to fixed simulation steps. The proposed platform employs RT-Events, a timestamp-based PWM generation technique, to capture rising/falling edges within simulation intervals (Fig. 1).
[ t{\text{event}} = t{\text{step}} + \Delta t{\text{offset}} ] where ( \Delta t{\text{offset}} ) is the timestamp offset within a step. This method reduces harmonic distortion and improves switching accuracy.
Experimental Validation
Test Scenarios
- Grid-Tied Operation: The energy storage inverter feeds 0.2 pu active power (( P{\text{ref}} = 4 \text{ kW} )) into the grid while maintaining ( Q{\text{ref}} = 0 ).
- Dynamic Response: Step changes in ( P_{\text{ref}} ) validate the control loop’s robustness.
Results
- Steady-State Performance: Grid current THD < 3%, DC voltage ripple < 2%.
- Dynamic Response: The inverter achieves 95% reference tracking within 10 ms.
Waveforms for grid voltage, current, and DC voltage are illustrated below:
Comparative Analysis of PWM Methods
Table 2 compares conventional PWM with RT-Events.
| Metric | Conventional PWM | RT-Events |
|---|---|---|
| Edge Detection Accuracy | ±50 μs | ±1 μs |
| Harmonic Distortion | 4.2% | 2.8% |
| Computational Overhead | Low | Moderate |
Conclusion
This paper demonstrates the effectiveness of an RT-LAB-based RCP platform for energy storage inverters. By integrating high-fidelity real-time simulation with advanced control strategies, the platform accelerates prototype development and validation. Key contributions include:
- A timestamp-based PWM method for enhanced switching accuracy.
- A modular hardware architecture supporting flexible grid integration tests.
Future work will explore multi-inverter coordination and fault-tolerant control under grid disturbances.
Mathematical Appendix
Space Vector PWM (SVPWM)
The SVPWM algorithm synthesizes reference voltages using eight switching vectors. The duty cycles for sectors I-VI are calculated as: [ T_1 = \frac{\sqrt{3} T_s}{U{dc}}} \left( u{\alpha} – \frac{u{\beta}}{\sqrt{3}} \right), \quad T_2 = \frac{\sqrt{3} T_s}{U{dc}}} \left( \frac{2 u{\beta}}{\sqrt{3}} \right) ] where ( T_s ) is the switching period and ( U{dc} ) is the DC link voltage.
PI Controller Design
The PI parameters for current loops are tuned using: [ K_p = L \omega_c, \quad K_i = R \omega_c ] where ( \omega_c ) is the desired bandwidth (typically 1/5th of the switching frequency).
This platform serves as a cornerstone for advancing energy storage inverter technologies, bridging the gap between simulation and real-world deployment.
